011 Seven In One Out
We glance at our face many times a day, thanks to mirrors. When you count the openings in our head, we find that we have two of many inputs: eyes, ears, and nostrils. Our mouth does a double duty: input for nutrition and hydration, and output for speech. (Yes, sometimes our nutrition does not wish to stay in place and exits the input door.) While our eyes do show emotion and our nostrils bring air in and out, our one mouth is the primary output in our head.
Redundancy, efficiency, location, depth perception, and nostrils changing duty every so many minutes are many of the items that our input duality achieves. Visible nutrition and not visible air enter the mouth. They are separated efficiently: nutrition one direction, and air rushing to the lungs for exchanging oxygen into the bloodstream in the other direction. Thrive or survive: one input type we see and the other type we don’t. However, each provides the necessary ingredients for life. Pretty good system if you ask me.
Our bodies have many sensory inputs. However, they only function as messengers to the brain, that gooey, watery, chemical habitat that seems to be the epicenter of us, the processing of outside signals into a reality that most of us seem to agree upon. It’s a good thing we can agree on most things. One exception for sure is that when I see a grey-green color, there is at least one other opinion that the color is really light blue. Oh well, maybe we don’t agree on all things.
So while we are ‘surviving,’ what part does our mouth’s output play? Output? We process this information and work out how to survive. Keeping in mind that our speech, sounds, songs, verbalized thoughts, discussions of dreams, repeating of historical events, placing communications in hand signs, on paper, woodwork, metal, magnetic material, and countless forms of directional, educational efforts are emanations of output - So?
I see a car. A thousand years ago, I saw a plate from oven-heated clay. 2 thousand years ago, I saw a separation of soil into copper and elements. 4 thousand years ago, I saw a candle burn from olive oil. Yes, I see differently today. I comprehend the accumulation of knowledge and how it has been used. Investigative, uplifting, sacrificial, loving words moving our planet’s inhabitants in one direction. Yet, at the same time, I see prejudice, hatred, war, selfishness, and division of species on every possible criterion at each of these time periods, items which follow our spoken words. It seems to me that if our speech is uplifting, we progress. If our speech is spiteful and divisive, we remain a species not much different from our ancestors.
Is speech the final frontier?
============
A person once said that if one’s eye is clear, then that person’s whole being is full of light.
Is it possible to restrict our audible output?
Are we helplessly trapped into a frequently changing ‘on’ and ‘off’ mode, demonstrated by our exiting words?
Is it possible to have an internal light that guides our external pathways of life?
We glance at our face many times a day, thanks to mirrors. When you count the openings in our head, we find that we have two of many inputs: eyes, ears, and nostrils. Our mouth does a double duty: input for nutrition and hydration, and output for speech. (Yes, sometimes our nutrition does not wish to stay in place and exits the input door.) While our eyes do show emotion and our nostrils bring air in and out, our one mouth is the primary output in our head.
Redundancy, efficiency, location, depth perception, and nostrils changing duty every so many minutes are many of the items that our input duality achieves. Visible nutrition and not visible air enter the mouth. They are separated efficiently: nutrition one direction, and air rushing to the lungs for exchanging oxygen into the bloodstream in the other direction. Thrive or survive: one input type we see and the other type we don’t. However, each provides the necessary ingredients for life. Pretty good system if you ask me.
Our bodies have many sensory inputs. However, they only function as messengers to the brain, that gooey, watery, chemical habitat that seems to be the epicenter of us, the processing of outside signals into a reality that most of us seem to agree upon. It’s a good thing we can agree on most things. One exception for sure is that when I see a grey-green color, there is at least one other opinion that the color is really light blue. Oh well, maybe we don’t agree on all things.
So while we are ‘surviving,’ what part does our mouth’s output play? Output? We process this information and work out how to survive. Keeping in mind that our speech, sounds, songs, verbalized thoughts, discussions of dreams, repeating of historical events, placing communications in hand signs, on paper, woodwork, metal, magnetic material, and countless forms of directional, educational efforts are emanations of output - So?
I see a car. A thousand years ago, I saw a plate from oven-heated clay. 2 thousand years ago, I saw a separation of soil into copper and elements. 4 thousand years ago, I saw a candle burn from olive oil. Yes, I see differently today. I comprehend the accumulation of knowledge and how it has been used. Investigative, uplifting, sacrificial, loving words moving our planet’s inhabitants in one direction. Yet, at the same time, I see prejudice, hatred, war, selfishness, and division of species on every possible criterion at each of these time periods, items which follow our spoken words. It seems to me that if our speech is uplifting, we progress. If our speech is spiteful and divisive, we remain a species not much different from our ancestors.
Is speech the final frontier?
============
A person once said that if one’s eye is clear, then that person’s whole being is full of light.
Is it possible to restrict our audible output?
Are we helplessly trapped into a frequently changing ‘on’ and ‘off’ mode, demonstrated by our exiting words?
Is it possible to have an internal light that guides our external pathways of life?